Understanding reader navigation patterns in multi-path hypertext fiction: A case study approach to Patchwork Girl
Authors
-
Nurul Hijja Mazlan
Universiti Teknologi MARA
Malaysia
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1746-2714
-
Candra Rahma Wijaya Putra
Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Indonesia
- Hary Sulistyo Universitas Gadjah Mada Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64595/lingtech.v1i1.3Keywords:
Comprehension, Engagement, Hypertext Fiction, Navigation Patterns, Reader MotivationAbstract
The rise of hypertext fiction has transformed narrative structures, challenging traditional reading behaviors and comprehension strategies. This study aims to investigate how readers navigate and engage with Patchwork Girl, a seminal work in hypertext fiction, focusing on navigation patterns, motivations, and their impact on comprehension and engagement. Employing a qualitative case study approach, the research involved 110 undergraduate English majors, using observations, interviews, and thematic analysis to uncover patterns and insights. Findings revealed three dominant navigation strategies—linear, exploratory, and random—each influenced by motivations such as curiosity, thematic alignment, and a desire for agency. Linear navigation resulted in higher comprehension, while exploratory navigation fostered moderate engagement, and random navigation led to cognitive overload and fragmented understanding. These findings underscore the importance of balancing narrative complexity with user guidance in hypertext design, offering valuable implications for digital storytelling and educational applications.
Downloads
References
Akbulut, Y. (2008). Predictors of foreign language reading comprehension in a hypermedia reading environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.39.1.c
Al Hadhrami, A. S., Raja Al-Amrat, M. G., Khasawneh, M. A. S., & Darawsheh, S. R. (2022). Approach to Improve Reading Skill of Students with Dyslexia. Information Sciences Letters, 11(6), 2333–2338. https://doi.org/10.18576/isl/110639
An, S. (2013). Schema theory in reading. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(1), 130–134. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.1.130-134
Antonenko, P. D., & Niederhauser, D. S. (2010). The influence of leads on cognitive load and learning in a hypertext environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.014
Bell, A., & Ensslin, A. (2024). Reading Digital Fiction: Narrative, Cognition, Mediality (p. 207). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003110194
Bezdan, E., Kester, L., & Kirschner, P. A. (2013). The influence of node sequence and extraneous load induced by graphical overviews on hypertext learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 870–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.016
Burin, D. I., Barreyro, J. P., Saux, G., & Irrazábal, N. C. (2015). Navigation and comprehension of digital expository texts: Hypertext structure, previous domain knowledge, and working memory capacity. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 13(3), 529–550. https://doi.org/10.14204/ejrep.37.14136
Bygstad, B., & Munkvold, B. E. (2016). Exploring the role of informants in interpretive case study research in IS. In Enacting Research Methods in Information Systems: Volume 2 (pp. 84–115). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29269-4_4
Calvi, L. (2004). Adaptivity in hyperfiction. 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1145/1012807.1012854
Campion, B. (2006). Theoretical framework for construction of representation through interactive narrative. 3942 LNCS, 380–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/11736639_49
Che, Y. (2014). A study on the application of schema theory to English newspaper reading. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(2), 441–445. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.2.441-445
Cheng, B., Lin, E., Wunderlich, A., Gramann, K., & Fabrikant, S. I. (2023). Using spontaneous eye blink-related brain activity to investigate cognitive load during mobile map-assisted navigation. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1024583
Chowdhury, S., Ahmmed, F., & Ismail Hossain, M. (2020). Methodological dilemma in microfinance research: Applicability of a qualitative case study design. Qualitative Report, 25(2), 271–290. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85080136287&partnerID=40&md5=e02093d92a5b0f6c80252e5373c74238
Ciccoricco, D. (2007). Reading network fiction (p. 244).
De Haan, J., Richards, D., & Dignum, F. (2018). Aiding learning efficiency in virtual worlds. 2018-January, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/VSMM.2017.8346286
de Jong, T. (2010). Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: Some food for thought. Instructional Science, 38(2), 105–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9110-0
de Vries, K. (2020). Case study methodology. In Critical Qualitative Health Research: Exploring Philosophies, Politics and Practices (pp. 41–52). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429432774-2
DeStefano, D., & LeFevre, J.-A. (2007). Cognitive load in hypertext reading: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1616–1641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.08.012
Do, T.-T. N., Singh, A. K., Cortes, C. A. T., & Lin, C.-T. (2020). Estimating the cognitive load in physical spatial navigation. 568–575. https://doi.org/10.1109/SSCI47803.2020.9308389
Eidloth, L., Roßner, D., & Atzenbeck, C. (2022). User study on link-service usage and information processing in the context of the world wide web. Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Human Factors in Hypertext, HUMAN 2022. https://doi.org/10.1145/3538882.3542802
Fitzgibbons, M. (2008). Implications of hypertext theory for the reading, organization, and retrieval of information. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2008(MAR.).
Gaikwad, P. (2017). Including rigor and artistry in case study as a strategic qualitative methodology. Qualitative Report, 22(13 Special Issue), 3431–3446.
Herrada-Valverde, G., & Herrada-Valverde, R. I. (2017). Factors influencing hypertext reading comprehension. OCNOS, 16(2), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.18239/ocnos_2017.16.2.1287
Ho, J. C. F., & Yao, M. Z. (2018). Sequence analysis in distributed interactive learning environments: Visualization and clustering of exploratory behavior. Journal of Educators Online, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.9743/jeo.2018.15.2.10
Howard, Z. L., Evans, N. J., Innes, R. J., Brown, S. D., & Eidels, A. (2020). How is multi-tasking different from increased difficulty? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 27(5), 937–951. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01741-8
Iran-Nejad, A. (2013). The schema: A long-term memory structure or a transient structural phenomena. In Understanding Readers’ Understanding: Theory to Practice (pp. 109–128). DOI: 10.4324/9780203056837
John Paul, X., & Christopher, G. (2017). Teaching reading skill using heuristic technique through schema theory. IUP Journal of English Studies, 12(1), 11–15.
Jordan, S. (2014). An infinitude of possible worlds: Towards a research method for hypertext fiction. New Writing, 11(3), 324–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790726.2014.932390
Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load aspects of text processing. In Cross-Disciplinary Advances in Applied Natural Language Processing: Issues and Approaches (pp. 114–132). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61350-447-5.ch009
Kalyuga, S., & Singh, A.-M. (2016). Rethinking the Boundaries of Cognitive Load Theory in Complex Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 831–852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9352-0
Kashihara, A., & Kawai, R. (2010). A self-regulator for navigational learning in hyperspace. 6094 LNCS(PART 1), 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13388-6_43
Khan, N. I. (2022). Case Study as a Method of Qualitative Research. In Research Anthology on Innovative Research Methodologies and Utilization Across Multiple Disciplines (pp. 452–472). DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-3881-7.ch023
Ko, M.-Y., & Wang, T.-F. (2013). EFL Learners’ Critical Literacy Practices: A Case Study of Four College Students in Taiwan. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(3), 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0013-5
Kohlbacher, F. (2006). The use of qualitative content analysis in case study research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-7.1.75
Mitchell, A. (2016). Using theme to author hypertext fiction. 10045 LNCS, 423–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48279-8_41
Mobrand, K. A., & Spyridakis, J. H. (2007). Explicitness of local navigational links: Comprehension, perceptions of use, and browsing behavior. Journal of Information Science, 33(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506068144
Modir, L., Abdul Aziz, S. B., & Saghafi, M. (2012). Appraisal of reader’s role in revolutionary potential of hypertext fiction. Life Science Journal, 9(4), 5244–5246. http://irdoi.ir/605-977-071-426
Modir, L., Guan, L. C., & Aziz, S. B. A. (2014). Text, Hypertext, and Hyperfiction: A Convergence Between Poststructuralism and Narrative Theories. SAGE Open, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014528915
Mulatu, E., & Regassa, T. (2022). Teaching reading skills in EFL classes: Practice and procedures teachers use to help learners with low reading skills. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2093493
Parsons, T. D., Asbee, J., & Courtney, C. G. (2023). Interaction of Cognitive and Affective Load Within a Virtual City. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 14(4), 2768–2775. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2022.3220953
Pope, J. (2006). A future for hypertext fiction. Convergence, 12(4), 447–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856506068368
Rajakannan, R., & Rukmini, S. (2021). Reading Paradigms of Digital Narratives: Reception of Hypertext Fictions and Its Implications. NALANS: Journal of Narrative and Language Studies, 9(18), 357–380. https://nalans.com/index.php/nalans/article/view/450
Rettberg, S. (2015). Interactive Digital Narrative: History, Theory and Practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315769189
Roth, C., & Koenitz, H. (2017). Towards creating a body of evidence-based interactive digital narrative design knowledge: Approaches and challenges. 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132361.3133942
Shuaib Mohamed Haneef, M. (2010). Intertextuality and interactivity in hypertext reading of www.timesofindia.com. Journal of Creative Communications, 5(3), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973258612471249
Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory: Recent theoretical advances. In Cognitive Load Theory (Vol. 9780521860239, pp. 29–47). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844744.004
Tabullo, Á. J., Saux, G. I., & Pearson, M. R. (2024). The role of executive functions in adolescents’ hypertext comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12473
Talafhah, R. H., & AL-Jarrah, J. M. (2019). Reading strategies used by ESL students at Southern Illinois University/Carbondale. Psychology and Education, 56(1–2), 67–78. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85066836882&partnerID=40&md5=7e7ebba1ca858f15724e133d96d2db08
Torun, E. D., & Altun, A. (2014). The effect of levels of processing with navigation design types on recall and retention in e-learning environments. Behaviour and Information Technology, 33(10), 1039–1047. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2014.945963
Xu, A. (2009). Cognitive overload and its countermeasures from the angle of information processing. 1, 391–394. https://doi.org/10.1109/IITA.2009.278
Yu, H., Abdullah, A., & Saat, R. M. (2014). Overcoming time and ethical constraints in the qualitative data collection process: A case of information literacy research. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 46(3), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000614526610
Zheng, X., Cheng, W., Fan, Z., & Chen, G. (2015). The effect of signals in hypertext reading by tablet computers. 118–119. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2015.80
Zumbach, J., & Mohraz, M. (2008). Cognitive load in hypermedia reading comprehension: Influence of text type and linearity. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 875–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.02.015
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nurul Hijja Mazlan, Candra Rahma Wijaya Putra, Hary Sulistyo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License